(The film ends with the King and Queen's departure from Versailles - while I know how the story ultimately ends, I'm curious as to what happened after they fled. Which is perhaps a bit dark of me, but I'm sure I'm not the only one who has picked up the book for this reason. Which I'm sure pleases Ms. Fraser - and, no doubt, her accountant.)
I've come to the part of the story where, after seven years of marriage, Louis XVI finally starts properly sticking it to Marie. The main reason for the marriage was for Marie to give birth to an heir. Louis XVI showed almost zero interest in spending time in the marriage bed trying to make it happen, however, and when he did try his deposits, apparently, landed mostly on the sheets. This was frustrating for many and humiliating for Marie, who took the brunt of the blame for the lack of matrimonial action. Teenagers when they were wed, it's surprising to me that it took so long. I remember being fifteen, and I would've stuck it in pretty much anyone if it meant even a small dose of hormonal relief. Even if I didn't really know what I was doing, I certainly would have been happy to have someone with whom to figure it all out.
Poor Marie Antoinette - she was pretty much openly mocked in the court at Versailles, falsely accused of all sorts of inappropriate behaviour - but despite her immense frustration, she showed a great deal of patience. And eventually the bedroom problems sorted themselves out.
Reading all of this has served to remind me of my current romantic situation. I've been seeing a man for just over a month now, and we've yet to get down to business. Oh sure, there's been some making out, a bit of groping - it's not all kittens and sunshine. But I'm a healthy, attractive young gay man, and I'm starting to get impatient. I mean, when the fuck are we gonna fuck? Let me state this clearly right now: this boy is not waiting seven years before things start to get going. I have needs. I have settled for a less-than-lustrous sex life in the name of love and companionship in the past and, frankly, I'm not prepared to do so again.
I can appreciate the old-fashioned novelty of taking it slow and getting to know each other. I won't lie - it's refreshing. And many would argue that a month is not really that long, and they would be right. But this hasn't been a date-once-or-twice-a-week deal, it's been three to four, with more or less daily communication. Perhaps, seeing as I've spent much of the past year being a slut and engaging in more one-night engagements than I care to count for fear I'll run out of digits, my sense of "normal" is out of whack. But to me that seems like an awful lot of dates to not be past the dry humping stage. Christ, I've yet to see him half-dressed, much less naked.
In an effort to see some skin I even suggested, under the guise of "fitness," that he come over to my building to use the sauna and pool. Cruelly, the day after he agreed that was a great idea, a notice went up in the lobby stating that the pool would be closed indefinitely for repairs and has yet to be removed.
It all started out innocently enough. After revealing to each other through a match-making friend that we find each other attractive (I believe he used the words "hot" and "foxy") the dates began. I was aware from the outset that in his 32 years he has never had a boyfriend. Worried there was something wrong with him, in an opportune moment I asked him point blank: "That's been by choice, right?" I was assured with a laugh that it was. Although if there was something wrong, would he really just come out and say so? Probably not.
Around the third or fourth date, there was some joking about "going all the way" which led to him telling me that he can handle pretty much anything "except pressure from boys." I told him "hey, no pressure, I don't believe in rushing into things." Which, when I later thought about it a little more carefully, is a bold-faced lie: I do like rushing into things. If I'm sure about someone or something, I tend to jump right in. (I operate mostly on instinct, and nearly every time I've stumbled in life it's because I've made the mistake of ignoring it.) That said, I think it's important to be open-minded and flexible - just because I usually jump doesn't mean I have to this time, right? The fact that I'd be willing to jump is the important factor here.
My instincts are still telling me to stick with him. This seems to be the start of a potentially really amazing thing (although I'm making a keen effort to not weigh things down with too much expectation, a mistake I've made time and time again). We're definitely into each other, and in terms of personality we complement each other in all the right ways - we have a great deal in common, with differences that counter each other just so.

But my instincts are also telling me that if I want some more action, I'm going to have to be the one to lead the way. Well... they're not 100% telling me that, but I'm sort of getting that vibe. Maybe it's more like, say... 82%? Regardless, I find myself in a precarious situation. He's told me he can't deal with pressure from boys, so I'm extremely hesitant to be pushy in any way. I feel like even bringing up the "when are we taking this further?" topic would potentially invite an elephant permanently into the room. Not exactly a threesome to which I aspire. At the same time, I feel like if I don't say anything at all, he might think I'm not interested. And to complicate things even further, I am not a leader in the bedroom department. Or rather, I am not generally the one who leads to the bedroom. My tendency is to let the other person do the leading. Once there, however, all bets are off. And once there once, I'll happily lead from that point on.
I think it's safe to say I may have some "control" issues.
I could, you may be thinking, just go out and find some sex (and indeed I did while in Montreal a few weeks ago) if it's so bloody important. And I could - there's been no talk of "exclusivity" or anything - but I don't really want to.
Like Marie Antoinette's, the general opinion in my court (read: my homo friends) seems to be that something is either wrong with me, or wrong with him:
"Sooo," Shawn asked me a couple weeks ago. "You banged him yet?"
"Um... no."
"What?!?" Pure shock. "Are you serious?"
"I never joke about sex." Well, at least not when I'm not having any.
"Dude, why not? What's the matter with him?"
"Nothing's wrong with him. We're just... taking things slow, that's all."
Silence, with a faint hint of... what's that? Derision?
"Did I mention he's never had a boyfriend?"
"So, anyway..." (insert random change of subject here)
This is not the only exchange like this I've had on this subject. In the spirit of Marie Antoinette, I smile, behave like everything is hunky-dory, and approach the subject, should it arise, with defiant optimism. Obviously I'm going to have to figure this one out on my own. And, hopefully, it will happen within seven weeks which is, based on everyone's reactions, roughly the gay equivalent of seven years. Which means I should see some head sometime before Christmas.
If not, it may be off with mine.

